Notes from Class Discussion on Weeding, Acquisitions, Donations, and Budgeting

The following are the notes from the discussion on held on October 28th.

  • Weeding

    • Shelf-crowding still exists in the e-environment.

    • Stacks vs. lounges

      • Can the books that have been removed to create space be replaced with online resources in some cases?

      • Deciding on how to use library space is part of trying to meet patrons’ sometimes competing needs, such as for study space, for collaboration space, and for physical collections.

  • Circulation statistics

    • Do librarians need to rely on them when making weeding and other decisions?

    • Circulation statistics can be useful to communicate your institution’s function/ needs.

    • How accurate are they?

    • What other statistics, such as browsing statistics and door count?

  • Donations can be a blessing and a curse.

    • Pros:

      • They can supplement a collection.

      • Donations can bring in revenue.

    • Cons:

      • Donations may have unforseen costs associated with them, such as the time and money it takes to process them.

      • Patrons have a strong desire to donate but a limited understanding of the collection.

        • Often education about donation policies start at the point of donation

  • Donor relations

    • It is important to maintain good relations with donors for a number of reasons

      • Pragmatically, it is important to keep the people happy who may donate something valuable to your collection.

      • Maintaining positive donor relations is also good for public relations.

      • Lastly, cultivating good will is simply a nice thing to do.

  • Donation specifics

    • It is important to establish an explicit agreement with donors

      • Be sure to tell the patron if you might discard the items

      • Be clear about what you will not accept

    • Using a donation form can help make comprehensive and uniform agreements

    • Having a written gift policy can help clarify issues and inform potential donors

      • It would be of the most use if it is widely disseminated and available online.

  • Collection policy

    • Having a well-worded policy that is not too restrictive or permissive can facilitate case-by-case decisions.

  • How are selection decisions made?

    • Professionals can use their discretion, although having accountability is important.

    • It may also be helpful to have a third- party voice on the selection panel.

  • Acquisition of electronic resources

    • Who maintains the electronic resources in perpetuity?

    • Where are these resources stored?

    • Digital information is much harder to preserve.

    • New technology does not supercede old technology

  • Ownership →  access transition

    • Who controls the resource you license?

      • Power shift from librarians to vendors

      • Publishers do not consider the needs of libraries, which make up only a small percentage of their customer base.

    • Publishers have proprietary systems for organizing and providing access to resources

      • They may differ in loan periods, subjects, headings and identification numbers

      • It could be beneficial if they would adopt a single set of practices, however this probably  would not happen unless the technology or the market demanded it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment